Sunday, July 31, 2005

blog of courage


What if we reported media the way media reports everybody else (except itself)?
Have you ever noticed that the media does not like to make itself a subject of public scrutiny, the way it scrutinizes every other insitution in the country? That the only news on media to ever appear in print or on television is that which covers itself with glory, real or faked? That, let alone targetting themselves the way they target others, journalists and editors use their vantage positions in the media to black out any criticism of themselves? That no matter how fierce the competition amongst themselves is, there's one unwritten code that hacks live by: that of not revealing the skeletons in their rivals' cupboards?
But http://spindianexpress.blogspot.com/ has written stories about indian express. excellant work.

AKA

Here is a list of names people have started calling ToI with:
1. Toilet Paper of India
2. Slimes of India
3. Tabloid of India
4. Times-up of India
5. Timepass of India
6. English Punjab Kesri (a popular tabliod in punjabi/hindi)
7. Turds of India
Know any more?

Ifthikar Geelani, an IIMCian says, "The IB uses reporters to plant stories"

Ifthikar Geelani was falsely accused of espionage andjailed. What followed was a media-led witch hunt and aKafkaesque trial, as he reveals in this interview withN P Chekkutty.

Ifthikar Geelani's book, My Days in Prison, releasedin Delhi earlier this year, has entered its thirdprint. It is widely described as a book which destroysthe media's comfortable complacency about the values of our democratic political system. Geelani, a youngjournalist working as the New Delhi bureau chief ofKashmir Times, a highly respected newspaper fromSrinagar, was arrested by the Delhi police on chargesof spying for the ISI, the Pakistani intelligenceagency. Geelani was kept in jail for seven months withoutbail, and the only proof produced against him was acopy of an old academic document about the presence ofIndian troops in the Valley, prepared by an Islamabadthink tank, which was found on the journalist's homecomputer. He was arrested and charged under theOfficial Secrets Act 1923, a much misused piece oflegislation. Geelani's arrest evoked serious protests and theNational Democratic Alliance Government led by A BVajpayee had to finally release the journalist afterunconditionally withdrawing the case it had filedagainst him in the metropolitan magistrate's court inDelhi, when it failed to muster any evidence againsthim.His arrest on a hot summer day in June 2002 and theeventual release on a cold winter evening in January2003 and the chilling experiences he had to face inthe police lock-up, the court-rooms and in Tihar Jail are described in the book which has already beentranslated into Malayalam.A Hindi translation is now in the pipeline. Geelani was in Kerala recently for the release of theMalayalam translation of the book, and he spoke atlength on the book, the case and the role the mediaplayed in the entire episode.
Q: Tell me about your background. How did you happento come to journalism?

I was born in Sopore in the Kashmir valley and came toDelhi after graduation from the Kashmir University anddid my journalism course at the Indian Institute ofMass Communication(IIMC). Then I worked for variouspublications and feature services for some time; I wastaken into the staff of The Pioneer when Vinod Mehtawas editor there. During my Pioneer days I went toBangalore for the SAARC meet where I met theeditor of the Pakistani newspaper, The Nation, and Iworked as their correspondent in New Delhi. Inbetween, I worked with Indian Express in Chandigarhand later came back to Delhi and joined Kashmir Timeswhere I work now.
Q: You have been based in Delhi as a journalist forover a decade and you are known in the media circlesthere. But then what actually led to your arrest andincarceration?

I think a number of factors contributed to my arrestand harassment. First, I was a Kashmiri and I happened to be theson-in-law of Syed Ali Shah Geelani who is a seniorleader of the Hurriyat Conference. They decided thattargeting me would put pressure on Geelani and theyknew this to be a surefire method as they hadsuccessfully tested it in the case of some otherleaders there. The second factor was that my newspaper, KashmirTimes, was not in the good books of the establishmentand our editor Mr. Ved Bhasin had to face threats fromthe Intelligence Bureau for his bold stand. In fact,our paper was responsible for the media campaign thatresulted in the dismissal of the Farooq AbdullahGovernment in 1983. The IB had reasons to feel unhappy with us because wehad carried a number of stories that exposed theirwrongdoings. Some of these stories had created seriousproblems for them. I think all these things made methe target of their schemes.
Q: Did the Geelani connection put you under anypressure in your professional duties as a journalistin Delhi?

Never. In fact, not even my close friends knew that Iwas his son-in-law until I was arrested. I keep myfamily out of my job. I am a professional and I insiston objectivity in my reports. Perhaps that iswhy the entire national media stood by me in the daysof my difficulties.
Q: How do you look at the media coverage of yourarrest, because you say in your book that most of thereports in the initial days were biased against you?

That is true. The media had been carried away by thefalse inputs provided by the Intelligence Bureaupeople and there were many factually incorrect reportsagainst me. For example, on the day of my arrest I sawa television channel report - live form the gate of myflat - that I had fled from the scene and that theauthorities had seized a large amount of money andincriminating documents from there. The fact is they could find only Rs. 3450 in my houseand some jewellery owned by my wife. But I had no wayto counter this as I was under arrest. Later on, when I was produced in the court, the crimereporter of a national daily reported that I hadconfessed that I was an ISI agent. It was a completelyfalse report, a plant by the IB meant to influence thecourt so that I would never get bail. There were somany such reports, and since I was in jail I had noopportunity to put the record straight and my familyhad to suffer great humiliations because of the falseand biased reports put out against me in those days.
Q: So you think there is a need for the media torethink its strategies on reporting such matters?

There is. It is very clear that reporters of even themost reputable publications are being used by thepolice and the IB to plant reports against theirvictims. And what can the victim do? He has no voicebecause he is either in the lock-up or in jail and hisversion never gets published. Such reports doinfluence the public perception. I have seen manypeople in the jail whose lives have been affected byirresponsible media reports. But this is a generalproblem and the media will have to collectively address such matters.
Q: After your release, did you ever meet any of thosereporters who put out such wrong reports against youwhen you were arrested?

I did not meet any. But I know that in some cases thereporters were misled by the authorities and when theyrealized how mistaken they were, they had made amendsand some of them had even taken a keen interest inmy defense. It was my friends like Asha Khosa of Indian Expressand Anouhita Majumdar who arranged a lawyer for me,and journalists like S K Pandey of the Delhi Union ofJournalists who took up my case. Finally, it wastheir collective effort that forced the government todrop the charges against me.
Q: How was the response from your newspaper during thedays of your arrest and jail life?

My paper stood by me in those difficult days. In fact,the management sent two senior editors to Delhi tofight my case and they did everything possible for mydefense. They ran a campaign in the paper,paid all the expenses for fighting my case and theyalso sent the monthly salary to my wife who was facinga kind of social boycott in the initial days of myarrest, because no one in our colony dared even totalk to her. But this changed eventually when themedia realized that I was innocent and changed theirattitude to me.
Q: How did your family cope with the difficultsituation?

Those were very difficult days for us, especially mywife. Her father was also under arrest; he wasarrested from Ranchion the same day and her twobrothers were hiding as they were afraid they toocould be taken into custody. She had to face the situationalone. Except for my friends from the media, there wasno one to turn to for help.
Q: Now that you are free, do you consider going tocourt for compensation?

After my bitter experiences in the court, I think itwould be of no use going to them for justice. When itwas proved that the police had forged a document toget me arrested, the court did not take cognizance ofthematter and take action against them. In fact, I was terribly dejected by the way the courttreated me in the case knowing fully well that I was ajournalist and the document they said violated theOfficial Secrets Act was simply a printed one freelyavailable on the internet. If my friends had failed to produce a copy of thedocument and prove the charges were false, I wouldhave been in jail for 14 years. So I don't know what Icould expect with that kind of judges. Perhaps if theywould review similar cases still pending in courtsunder this obsolete legislation called OfficialSecrets Act, I think that would be a bettercompensation for me than any monetary gains.
Contact: chekkutty@gmail.com
P.S: Iftikhar Geelani was the Resident Editor of twoPakistan-based newspapers, The Nation and The FridayTimes, as well as the bureau chief of the Jammu-basedKashmir Times when he was arrested on June 9, 2002. Heis one of All Parties Hurriyat Conference leader SyedAli Shah Geelani's two sons-in-law.

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

A Secular Rethink

As a freelance journalist , I’m putting up this notice to encourage people to submit an entry. Please send all further correspondance to the address at the end of the post, not to me. Also, as this is an announcement, no comments are enabled.‘A SECULAR RETHINK’THE INDIAN EXPRESS - CITIZENS FOR PEACE ANNUAL ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION
Citizens for Peace (CfP) is proud to announce its alliance with The Indian Express Group to organize a national level essay competition on the theme ‘A Secular Rethink’. This competition, the first of an annual endeavor, aims at reawakening all Indians to the need for redefining ’secularism’ in today’s time.
The prize-winning entry in English and Hindi will each receive grand prize of Rs. 50,000. The winning essay in English will be published in The Indian Express and the winning essay in Hindi will be published in Jansatta. A panel of five eminent persons from different fields will judge the entries. The competition is open to all individuals above 18 years of age. The essay should not exceed 2000 words.

Entries can be submitted by post to The Indian Express-Citizens for Peace Essay Writing Competition, Express Towers, 2nd Flr, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 or by email to citizensforpeace@gmail.com. All entries must be received by August 15, 2005. The winners of this contest will be felicitated at an award ceremony to be held in Mumbai on October 2nd, 2005.

write about A SECULAR RETHINK , and I'm going for it. Yes, there is a Rs. 50,000 prize....you can furgget it, I gotta pay some dues.

Monday, July 25, 2005

Ambani Vs Ambani: Storms in the Sea Wind by alam srinivas

Ambani Vs Ambani: Storms in the Sea Wind by Alam Srinivas is “about the internal and external factors ...about unrelated factors that made it impossible for Mukesh and Anil to work together”. The book has a rather interesting dramatis personae, where Pramod Mahajan is described as one “who was accused of being close to Mukesh and who vehemently denied it”, Shankar Adwal as “Mukesh’s chief lobbyist in Delhi, he constantly lamented...that the two Ambanis were fighting so openly” and Prem Chand Gupta as “the minister for company affairs who never revealed his true cards... and kept changing his stance regularly”. From the business editor of a leading Indian weekly, this is quite a thriller, involving most of contemporary India’s business and political players. But “the final chapter is yet to be written in this saga.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:In his twenty-year career as a journalist, Alam Srinivas, Business Editor, Outlook, has worked for premier Indian publications like The Times of India, Businessworld, India Today and Business Today. He has focused on investigative pieces exposing corporate corruption and the nexus between big business and politics. Since 1986, he has written dozens of articles on the Reliance group and the various controversies that gripped the Ambani family. He lives in Delhi.

Jaychands and Meerjafers of IIMC

Hello friends
this is sushant jha from 2004-05 batch of RTV once I wrote about the lack of proper marketing of IIMC and now i want to say something more . Once i alongwith some of my unemployed friend were wondering around the office of prof chari.A staff of RTV told me that if i arrange some student who are eager to join the mass com. in a pvt institue of Gurgoan run by ex- IIMC director J.S. Yadav , he will make some commission available [10% of the total fees of that institute] to me and also if i trap more than five student than Mr Yadav will make me placed through his vast contacts
The problem is not here to blame anyone for establishing his own media school, but the real problem is the person who happens to be in the faculy of IIMC , make bread and butter, name and fame, add the work ex of IIMC in their CV , becomes' a never see eye to eye ' enemy of the institute afteer retirement. A course director whose voice is like Om Puri is engaged in the placement of Vivekanand institute because that institute is run by his castemen and they pay commission to that faculty of IIMC.
Also friend what is the logic of making N Ram, Chandan Mitra and many media kings our governing body members when they have no role in our placement ? And why should they afterall they have their own media school?
so the real enemy is not the emergence of pvt intitutes but the Jaychands and Meerjafers of IIMC

Sushant Jha
2004-05 batch
IIMC Delhi

Manas Chakravarty: Reporter`s Diary: The DNA Effect

PRE-DNA

Jan 3, 2005: Terrible day. I was rudely woken up by a phone call from Boss complaining loudly that I had missed several stories.

Boss warned me that I wouldn’t get an increment this year. I’ve decided to send my family to our native village because I can’t afford to pay the rent.

Jan 4: I really get tired, travelling in that packed train to office in town and then coming back home all the way to Thane.

I’ve broken the news about ABC Corporation planning to pump in $5 billion into India. Boss said they would take it on page 1 of the Companies section if they didn’t have anything better.

Jan 5: Boss’s pet from the Banking Bureau got that junket to Singapore. My friend’s application for a job was turned down by the Resident Editor (RE) on the grounds that his ten years’ experience is not good enough.

Boss also made a sarcastic remark about my copy—he said I couldn’t write for nuts.

Jan 6: Received my salary today. Paid credit card dues with half of it, but I’ll have to borrow some more money to pay my bills. My application for leave to take my family to our native village has been turned down. Boss tells me I must work harder and submit at least two exclusive stories daily.

Jan 7: I’m sick of remaining senior reporter for five years, so I went to a rival paper to try and get a job. No luck. I think I’ll open a paan-beedi shop.


POST-DNA

July 3, 2005: Great day. I was woken up by a call from DNA offering me a job as principal correspondent with a 100 per cent rise in salary. I immediately told my boss about the offer. He made a counter-offer on the spot, making me special correspondent with a 120 per cent rise in salary.

July 4: Our Deputy Resident Editor has joined DNA taking ten reporters with him. Boss asked me whether I would like to go on a junket to Singapore. I said I only go to Western countries.

I’ve been asked to choose between junkets to New York, London and Paris. I said I would go for all of them.

July 5: Our News Editor has joined Mumbai Mirror, taking with him five sub-editors. I have got another offer from Hindustan Times. I told Boss about it, and I’ve been made Deputy Chief of Bureau.

I’ve also been told to ask friends and relatives to join the paper. My sister, who has just given her BA exam, has joined as principal correspondent.

The RE has also made a job offer to my cousin, who is twelve years old—he will be absorbed six years later as Assistant Editor when he turns eighteen.

July 6: Our Associate Editor has joined Hindustan Times, taking my boss with him. I told the RE that I had a job offer from Mumbai Mirror, although I haven’t actually got it. He has made me Bureau chief, replacing my boss.

The company has offered me a car, and another 25 per cent hike. I finally submitted a story today, after three weeks. It was an old recycled story about how steel companies may lower prices. The RE said that it was one of the finest stories he had ever come across, and took it on page 1.

July 7: I was woken up this morning by an SMS from the RE telling me how much he loved me. I’ve bought a two-bedroom flat in Bandra. Our tea boy has been poached by DNA, and has been made a Bureau chief there.

My sister has become a special correspondent at Hindustan Times. I told the RE that I was tired of writing news. He said that was no problem, and that with my excellent writing skills I could write features, edits, columns, etc.

I suggested that I write an edit on the media scene with the heading “May a hundred DNAs bloom”, but the suggestion left him cold. I am deeply offended. I have discreetly let it be known that I am open to being poached as Executive Editor.

Monday, July 18, 2005

Shouldn’t scribes behave themselves?

The execrable behaviour of journalists in Mysore at the cremation of the husband of Nidhi Kulapathi, a New Delhi television anchor, last week could have been dismissed as churlishness from testosterone-rich males but for the regularity with which scribes in that City fail to remember that they are in the business to report news, not to make it. Admittedly, the lady’s action of snatching a photographer’s camera chip for shooting pictures of a family affair and threatening to speak to the chief minister wasn’t entirely above reproach. And that the police did not order a post-mortem on the body found in mysterious circumstances in a hotel room with gnashes under the eye can be questioned. Still, to use that as a licence to hold up the final rites demanding an apology from the grieving widow at the funeral pyre takes mind-bending insensitivity and shamelessness, and Mysore’s scribes have provided both by the bucketful.
At one level, the journalists’ rudeness should leave their readers wondering if they have become a law unto themselves, with none of the social norms and graces that apply to ordinary humans being applicable to them. At another level, the journalists’ arrogant presumption that they have a fundamental right to intrude shows just where ‘gotcha’ journalism is heading. If this is what journalists can do to one of their own, God forbid what they can do to the rest. Whether a prominent personality’s private life is automatically of public interest can be debated till the media bulls come home. But there can be little debate that Mysore’s editors, reporters and photographers and their various associations and guilds need to introspect big-time on their recent conduct to prevent readers from becoming cynical and suspicious. The simple question they need to ask themselves is this: do they want to set an example as the eyes and ears of the public? Or do they want to flex their muscles at the risk of their credibility?

Friday, July 15, 2005

kya entry mari hai yar!


Leading Delhi-based newspaper Hindustan Times on Thursday launched its Mumbai edition. Whatever we cover from politics to people, from world development to local news and from economic to entertainment, we will do it with style, depth and class," Editor and Director, Vir Sanghvi said in its front page editorial.
Delhi's largest selling and most read paper is targeting the 'top-end, discerning' reader in Mumbai. It hopes, say reports to hit a circulation of 2 lakh in a year.That is a good target. It is just under half of leader The Times of India's (TOI) Mumbai circulation. It is also the number at which advertisers will pick up any alternative to TOI. Reports say HT has already sewn up a large part of the number through a subscription drive started three months ago. Against the Rs 4 that TOI Mumbai sells for, HT's Mumbai edition is priced at Rs 2.50. Its card rate for advertisement space is Rs 500 per sq cm, against Rs 1,570-1,700 for TOI and Rs 800 (colour) for DNA. The last is a daily from the Zee-Bhaskar combine scheduled for launch on 30 July.

Poacher and recruitment


Many newspapers in India have always excelled in the dirty habit of giving counter-offers to their journalists who managed a new job with enormous difficulty. Those days are mostly over, thank God. The media honchos have always refused to pay according to your true worth, until a poacher came along to pay you double your true value!
Counter-offers to keep staffers are mostly gone. If 'X' poaches from 'Y', the 'poached staffer' is immediately absorbed into 'X', with the new employer paying up the notice period dues. This leaves little time for further negotiations for the journalist to extract salaries from current employer. There is a new kind of forced ethics - the papers cannot offer cannot counter-offers, and journalists can't take them anymore.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Kar Lo Duniya Mutthi Mein -Explore, Search and Discover our planet

Want to know more about a specific location?

Dive right in -- Google Earth combines satellite imagery, maps and the power of Google Search to put the world's geographic information at your fingertips.
  • Fly from space to your neighborhood. Type in an address and zoom right in.
  • Search for schools, parks, restaurants, and hotels. Get driving directions.
  • Tilt and rotate the view to see 3D terrain and buildings.
  • Save and share your searches and favorites. Even add your own annotations.

link:- http://earth.google.com/

download this tool and enjoy it at your desktop

Sunday, July 10, 2005

BROADCAST NEWS for hardcore journalist


Vetran journalist & Sr. editor of indian express Mr. Diptosh Majumdar and columnist of indian express Sagrika Ghosh are leaving Indian express and join Rajdeep's broadcast news. Mr. Diptosh majumdar is joining broadcast news as National affair editor. That mean,rajdeep has planed for pure journalistic News channel. It's good for serious people, who watch news not for entertainment. Oherside

TV18's chief executive Haresh Chawla says "Already 65 people are on board. We expect to hire about 300."

Agrees Chawla: "Business is a profitable space. We may launch regional business news channels later."

Friday, July 08, 2005

Now times of india became RSSd




Look this add. what does times of india want to communicate from this stupid add MANY INDIAS? I couldn't understand. How many indias ?? I am searching . if so many indian community live in india then why did only show the hindu sign TILAKDHARI forehead???

I think, times of india group has become RSS follower

Amity Syndrome is Killing Journalism:- subhash dhuliya


Long back, Dhurv Todria did his journalism course from Garhwal University and came to newspaper in Lucknow I was working with for internship. He was very talented among the lot and on his own decided to work at district level as he rightly felt the real events occur at grass root level. He did not pay any heed to my segmentation that initial few years he should spend at some major city. He became correspondent of Amar Ujala at Rishikesh in Dehradun district -my home town-and was doing extremely well. He filed a story against Dr Gupta the "Mrigi specialist". (The doctor is now in jail) as most of us now aware. He was offered bribe and he refused. Then one fine morning he was removed and the Doctor made it a point that he does not get job in any other organization. The Doctor was providing huge advertisements to all newspapers-the TV boom has not occurred at that time. He was highest income tax payer of UP and even "physician" of "president of India" as per his claim. The entire medical fraternity of Dehradun region knew the about the "medical expertise" of the Doctor but there was not a single media outlet that could take on him.

No one can afford to be so utopian that would suggest that every media outlet can afford to offend advertisers. Advertisers do have a say and it is fact of life. But there has to be “lakshman rekha”. Can we afford to have a media model in which people involved in all kinds of businesses can buy media because they happen to carry huge money bag? We have large number of business and industrial houses and they do indulge in irregular practices and media perhaps cannot do much. But do we need to have some kind of threshold for this kind of irregular practices? What can be ignored and what cannot be? Media news gathering model is becoming very anti-people in a way. Good news story need more expenses so they tend to go for a story which is easily available for little money and that is why all kind of fraudulent practices that are prevailing in rapidly booming education industry are being ignored by media.

I know a bit about media education and know large number of institutions who have taken affiliation form more than one university because they can take only sixty students in one professional course-more affiliation means running more courses from same facilities and minting more money. Three year degree course and sixty students in mean 180 students for BJ and if fee is 50,000 you can calculate how much money it means? And more than one degree course and MJ too. Soon they will start providing PhDs also and if academicians like former Director of IIMC have a say they will be best sited to become faculty members at premier institutions of the country? And quality of education- they are just selling dreams; promising these youngsters job of anchors in leading television channels; promising them to make them famous in half an hour and why not in this age everybody can be famous for 15 minutes; claiming 100 percent placement – see the flood of advertising and the claims that are being made. These youngsters are not guided or trained but misguided and misinformed and our news media is not bothered to pay any attention to the fraud of this colossal nature.

How can education be permitted to become this kind of naked commerce? Amity got university from Chatisgarh and once supreme courts intervened on Prof. Yash Pal pleas-they “managed” it from UP? What are the fee structure and the faculty in all this kind of universities? How come there are only three sections in Class X and in Class XI it are eight sections of sixty students each. Students being attracted from state like Bihar, MP, UP –promising international class education. How much fee is charged? These are just few random information I got from my personal experience and it was job of news media to inform me what is not within domain of my personal and direct experience but I know nothing more.

Now with regard to Amity the first question which arises is why any organization having commitment to education should get involved in the kind of aggressive media blitz that Amity in involved in? Why an education institution should try to buy media as was the case of Tehelka and same thing was repeated to NDTV-offering huge advertisement? If there is nothing fishy why to be afraid of”false news”? Education is not blatant business of street smart capitalism mode. Few days back I happen to visit a "journalism school" having affiliation with Bhopal University. It was a small space with very clumsy class room and even the address was fraudulent. I discover that this institute has affiliation with four universities -Bhopal, Hissar and two from south India. The would be anchor does not read newspapers only “guides” for examination of journalism and who knows perhaps this is the need of fast expanding television news media and I may prove wrong ? People like me are branded too “Idealistic” who do not know needs of the news industry that is being governed by weekly market rating! And rape sells well and fast not colossal fraud in education as if education is not concern of common people.

Subhash Dhuliya

Thursday, July 07, 2005

NYT reporter refuses to divulge source

jailedA Washington court sent New York Times reporter Judith Miller toprison on Wednesday for refusing to divulge the name of a source to agrand jury probing the leak of the identity of a Central IntelligenceAgency agent.
Citing Miller for contempt of court, Judge Thomas Hogan jailed theveteran reporter until she agrees to testify or until the grand jury'smandate runs out in four months.
"If journalists cannot be trusted to guarantee confidentiality thenjournalists cannot function. There cannot be free press," Miller toldthe judge.
"I am here today because I believe in the rule of law and your rightto send me to prison for disobeying your ruling if you choose to doso," she said.
Another journalist who had been facing possible prison time inconnection with the case, Time magazine's Matthew Cooper, told thejudge that he had agreed to testify to the grand jury.
Cooper said his source had given him a personal waiver allowing him totestify."
I am prepared to testify. I will comply" with the court's order,Cooper told Hogan.
Cooper took the podium in the court and told the judge, "Last night Ihugged my son goodbye and told him it might be a long time before Isee him again."
"I went to bed ready to accept the sanctions" for not testifying,Cooper said. But he told the judge that not long before his earlyafternoon appearance, he had received "in somewhat dramatic fashion" adirect personal communication from his source freeing him from hiscommitment to keep the source's identity secret.
Miller and Cooper have been at the centre of a high-stakes case thickwith political intrigue, enmeshing the White House, press freedom andthe rationale for the Iraq war.
They had refused to name their sources to a federal prosecutorexamining which Bush administration official leaked the name of CIAspy Valerie Plame during a fierce row over Iraq's alleged weapons ofmass destruction program.
Plame's husband, former US ambassador Joseph Wilson, claimed her coverwas blown in revenge for an article he penned in The New York Timescriticising Bush's justification for war with Iraq.July 07, 2005 http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/jul/07press.htm

Star News CEO Misbehaves with Journalists



Sources have revealed that Star News CEO Uday Shankar uses very harsh languge and misbehaves withjournalists. If there is a contrary version to it,please let us know to set the record straight.
But if it is really true, is there a way to respond tosuch misbeahaviour with journalists by corporatebosses?
At least all instances of such misbeahaviour should beput in public domain for the sake of record. It shouldnot be brushed under the carpet. But while puttingsuch things in public, one should also refer to bothsides of the story.
In the era of corporate autocracy, one should notsuffer indignity in silence.
1to1.in - FREE Dating & Social Networking with Indians World Over ! Free Web Site Counter
Free Counter